{"created":"2023-07-25T10:47:15.758357+00:00","id":272,"links":{},"metadata":{"_buckets":{"deposit":"5c79beda-9a23-477f-9039-dcb5dd6404e1"},"_deposit":{"created_by":1,"id":"272","owners":[1],"pid":{"revision_id":0,"type":"depid","value":"272"},"status":"published"},"_oai":{"id":"oai:fcu.repo.nii.ac.jp:00000272","sets":["9:11:45"]},"author_link":["932","933"],"item_10002_biblio_info_7":{"attribute_name":"書誌情報","attribute_value_mlt":[{"bibliographicIssueDates":{"bibliographicIssueDate":"2023-02-28","bibliographicIssueDateType":"Issued"},"bibliographicPageEnd":"182","bibliographicPageStart":"167","bibliographicVolumeNumber":"15","bibliographic_titles":[{"bibliographic_title":"都市経営 : 福山市立大学都市経営学部紀要"},{"bibliographic_title":"Urban Management : Bulletin of the Faculty of Urban Management, Fukuyama City University","bibliographic_titleLang":"en"}]}]},"item_10002_description_19":{"attribute_name":"フォーマット","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"application/pdf","subitem_description_type":"Other"}]},"item_10002_description_5":{"attribute_name":"抄録","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"本稿は，花崎－徐論争に着目し，両者の立論にみられる２つの責任論と対話観の特徴とその接点を検討する．徐にみられる〈責任所在論〉は，歴史的で現在的な構造下の立場に置かれた全員に〈関与の責任〉があると考える．人はそれを知ることにより責任当事者となり，責任遂行上の倫理に拘束される．その対話観は，現実や事実の妥当性をめぐり，相互理解の到達を目指す知識人のコミュニケーションである．花崎にみられる〈責任主体論〉は，有限で実存的な主体が，自己内省を通じて，所与の歴史的で現在的な条件と自らの生きる価値との両義性の中で〈コミットメントの責任〉を形成すると考える．他者の問いかけはその契機をなし，主体の応答は内発的な倫理を伴う．その対話観は，相互の共感と承認による連帯を目指す，実存的な主体同士のコミュニケーションである．これらの接点は，脱植民地主義の克服に向けたコミュニケーションにおける，自他のまなざしの決定権をめぐる〈相互行為の遂行的権力〉と状況の決定権をめぐる「状況の定義」という分析的焦点により探究されうる．\nThis paper examines the characters, differences, and relevance between the two responsibility theories and dialogues, focusing on the Hanazaki-So controversy. Responsibility Existence Theory seen in So’s argument assumes that responsibility of involvement exists in a position under the historical and current structure and applies to all people who belong to its position. They are restricted by its ethics when they know the responsibility. Its idea of dialogue signifies the communication of intellectual persons who try to attain mutual understanding about the validity of the fact or reality. Responsible Subject Theory seen in Hanazaki’s argument assumes that a limited and existential subject makes responsibility of commitment through their self-reflection in which they consider the ambivalence between historical and current conditions and their worthiness of life. Calling by others is its moment, then a responsibility held by a subject accompanies with their internal ethics. Its idea of dialogue signifies the communication between existential subjects who try to attain solidarity through mutual sympathy and social recognition. This intersection can be inquired in two analytical points of communication toward the resolution of post-colonialism: the performative power of interaction around the authority of identity definition, and the “definition of situation” around the authority of situation.","subitem_description_type":"Abstract"}]},"item_10002_publisher_8":{"attribute_name":"出版者","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_publisher":"福山市立大学都市経営学部"}]},"item_10002_relation_14":{"attribute_name":"DOI","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_relation_type_id":{"subitem_relation_type_id_text":"info:doi/10.15096/UrbanManagement.1512","subitem_relation_type_select":"DOI"}}]},"item_10002_source_id_11":{"attribute_name":"書誌レコードID","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_source_identifier":"AA12564315","subitem_source_identifier_type":"NCID"}]},"item_10002_source_id_9":{"attribute_name":"ISSN","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_source_identifier":"2186-862X","subitem_source_identifier_type":"ISSN"}]},"item_creator":{"attribute_name":"著者","attribute_type":"creator","attribute_value_mlt":[{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"山口, 健一"},{"creatorName":"ヤマグチ, ケンイチ","creatorNameLang":"ja-Kana"}],"nameIdentifiers":[{"nameIdentifier":"932","nameIdentifierScheme":"WEKO"}]},{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"YAMAGUCHI, Ken’ichi","creatorNameLang":"en"}],"nameIdentifiers":[{"nameIdentifier":"933","nameIdentifierScheme":"WEKO"}]}]},"item_files":{"attribute_name":"ファイル情報","attribute_type":"file","attribute_value_mlt":[{"accessrole":"open_date","date":[{"dateType":"Available","dateValue":"2023-07-05"}],"displaytype":"detail","filename":"toshi15_12yamaguchi.pdf","filesize":[{"value":"1.1 MB"}],"format":"application/pdf","licensetype":"license_note","mimetype":"application/pdf","url":{"label":"toshi15_12yamaguchi.pdf","url":"https://fcu.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/272/files/toshi15_12yamaguchi.pdf"},"version_id":"88e7f9dc-afe4-4c3e-b03d-d6739ce3c377"}]},"item_keyword":{"attribute_name":"キーワード","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_subject":"脱植民地主義","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"関与の責任","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"コミットメントの責任","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"相互行為の遂行的権力","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"状況の定義","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"post-colonialism","subitem_subject_language":"en","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"responsibility of involvement","subitem_subject_language":"en","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"responsibility of commitment","subitem_subject_language":"en","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"performative power of interaction","subitem_subject_language":"en","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"definition of situation","subitem_subject_language":"en","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"}]},"item_language":{"attribute_name":"言語","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_language":"jpn"}]},"item_resource_type":{"attribute_name":"資源タイプ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"resourcetype":"departmental bulletin paper","resourceuri":"http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]},"item_title":"２つの責任論，２つの対話観：花崎－徐論争の一含意","item_titles":{"attribute_name":"タイトル","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_title":"２つの責任論，２つの対話観：花崎－徐論争の一含意"},{"subitem_title":"Two Responsibility Theories, Two Ideas of Dialogue : An implication of the Hanazaki-So controversy","subitem_title_language":"en"}]},"item_type_id":"10002","owner":"1","path":["45"],"pubdate":{"attribute_name":"公開日","attribute_value":"2023-07-05"},"publish_date":"2023-07-05","publish_status":"0","recid":"272","relation_version_is_last":true,"title":["２つの責任論，２つの対話観：花崎－徐論争の一含意"],"weko_creator_id":"1","weko_shared_id":-1},"updated":"2023-07-25T10:49:41.596717+00:00"}